Target Marketing and Consumer Privacy - Some Do's and Don'ts

Let's face it; to survive you have to market yourthe Internet, and Rep. Joe Barton (R-Texas),
business. That means reaching the right audience,wrote to Charter asking it to put the test on hold
those who have an interest in the kind ofto give time for discussions.
products you are selling and making the pitch.If this idea was not so alarming, what would there
That is pretty self-evident as far as it goes. Webe to discuss?
have word of mouth, ads on traditional massAs for the other two, Embarq Corporation and
media outlets such as TV, radio and print; andCenturyTel, Inc., both phone companies, have
now there is Internet marketing, with its searchfinished their testing and are still considering the
engine optimization, pay-per-action ads and socialmove. Embarq has yet to come to a decision but
marketing, that reaches people not just acrossCenturyTel's head of investor relations, Tony
town but around the world. The technology usedDavis, claims that Charter's decision was based on
to reach these potential customers is powerful,cable industry regulations and, therefore, don't
flexible and becoming more useful and expansiveapply to telephone companies, saying that "At this
each day.point it's not affecting our thinking."
However, technology moves a great deal fasterIt has not affected their thinking. Why does this
than either law or ethics. This has been the case,not surprise me?
for example, with physics (nuclear technology),The Cost of Behavioral Advertising
and biology (cloning, stem cell research), and it isFor those of you who answered, "Because you
certainly the case with Internet technology,are a cynic," I congratulate you on your insight
especially when it comes to the subject ofbut no, it has more to do with Tony Davis'
targeted advertising and its effects on privacy.position with CenturyTel. He's the guy charged
How Targeted Advertising Workswith keeping the investors happy and-all other
Also known as "Behavioral Advertising," this isthings being as they should be-the more income
based on a given user's browsing history. This is astreams a company has, the happier those
departure from its close cousin, "Contextualinvestors get. It is one of the fundamentals of
Advertising," since it doesn't look at currentbusiness, right? The problem is that Davis and his
search engine results to generate relevantcohorts are forgetting another fundamental of
advertisements; it looks at the user individually tobusiness: Be a good corporate neighbor.
determine what they are interested in.I don't see any good to behavioral marketing. You
Network vs. Onsite Behavioral Advertisingmay have figured that out by now. I see it as an
Behavioral advertising both over networks and oninvasion of my privacy, a reminder that what I
specific sites is based on building up demographicam doing online and in the privacy of my own
data on what users spend most of their timehome is being monitored and I am just
looking at with networks building up this data byold-fashioned enough not to like it. How does this
looking at specific sites people visit while onsitetranslate into action? It is simple: I do not click on
advertisers look at where users go on a singleany ads that correspond to things that I have
site and target their ads based on that data.searched for and I trash any e-mails that relate
The rationale behind this is that the money spentto anything I have been looking at. I may not be
by advertisers is better used when the ads areable to get out of this monitoring but I can
targeted to the specific needs of the audience.choose whether or not I reward the people
Why would someone who enjoys mountain biking,invading my privacy.
but isn't interested in fishing, want informationIf I am making that choice, refusing to give my
from a travel agency that specializes in Canadianbusiness to companies who offensively invade my
fishing trips? They wouldn't, so why waste thatprivacy, then there are many, many others. In a
travel agency's money advertising to them? Onrecent study of consumer attitudes toward
the other hand, say the advertisers, since therebehavioral marketing, Truste, a consumer privacy
are plenty of mountain bike-related ads that wouldorganization, came up with some interesting
be perfect for this person to see, shouldn't westatistics:
make sure they see them?- 71% of online consumers are aware that their
The major concern is privacy. Even when thebrowsing information may be collected by a third
advertisers are using anonymous data based onparty for advertising purposes, but only 40
the number of hits that certain sites or links get,percent are familiar with the term "behavioral
there are concerns that the privacy of the Webtargeting."
users who are visiting those sites and clicking- 57% of respondents say they are not
those links is somehow being violated. American'scomfortable with advertisers using that browsing
have traditionally resented anything that smackshistory to serve relevant ads, even when that
of being monitored. Since 9/11, we have acceptedinformation cannot be tied to their names or any
more of that from the government and lawother personal information.
enforcement (lest the terrorists win) but when it- 91% of respondents expressed willingness to
comes to private corporations harvesting andtake necessary steps to assure increased privacy
using that data-especially since they seem to beonline when presented with the tools to control
pretty bad at keeping our personal informationtheir internet tracking and advertising experience.
confidential-Americans still tend to have a problem.- 64% would choose to see online ads only from
ISP Behavioral Advertising and the Threat toonline stores and brands that they know and
Privacytrust.
That said, we can recognize that it is one thing- 44% of respondents would click buttons or
for a network of sites to look at where peopleicons to make that happen.
are going in order to target advertising, but quite- 42% percent say they would sign up for an
another when an internet service provider (ISP)online registry to ensure that advertisers are not
does it. After all, they already know us by farable to track browsing behaviors, even if it meant
more than just an IP address. They have ourthat they would receive more ads that are less
names, addresses, phone numbers-credit reportsrelevant to their interests.
for all we know-and they can also track ourThe analysts at Truste say that education,
movements and communications on Webtransparency, real choices and real value are
whether we like it or not.needed before this kind of advertising is
This comes as a surprise to most people for theacceptable to the majority of people. Right now,
simple reason that few, if any, of us ever readhowever, this approach to marketing, regardless
the voluminous mass of painfully tiny-and oftenof what people say about wanting to see more
semi-legible gray-type that makes up the ISP'srelevant advertising, is not beloved of the masses
end-user license agreement (EULA). In a Foxwith a very sizeable percentage wanting it out of
News interview, Marvin Ammori, general counseltheir lives entirely. How do you think they feel
of Free Press, a Washington-based consumerabout the advertisers behind those unwanted
advocacy group, said: "The network is assertingads? It can't be good and, ultimately, that is the
almost complete control of the users' ability tocost of invading people's privacy. Their opinion of
use their network as a gateway to the Internet.you and your company goes bad and they deny
They become gatekeepers rather thanyou the one thing you want-the very reason you
gateways." This role as "gatekeepers" alsoinvaded their privacy in the first place-that sale.
includes monitoring your Web surfing, watchingThe Bottom Line
the way you use your e-mail and even decidingSometimes, in the mad scramble for cash that is
what sites you can or cannot visit.today's marketplace, it is good to step back, take
Given that much power handed over bya couple of breaths and consider what you get
customers who just want to get online, is it anyand what you lose by going with the latest and
wonder that some ISPs are looking at behaviorgreatest of anything. In the case of this
advertising as a new income generator? Itbehavioral marketing, what you might gain by
shouldn't be. Three of the nation's largest ISPsemploying it will mostly be lost by the way people
have been considering a plan by a company calledwill be turned off by knowing that you have your
NebuAd, Inc., to launch behavior-based advertisingeye on them. If you want to target customers,
on their systems.target your own, keep an eye on what they buy
The response from both privacy advocates andand suggest things based on that data. They have
public figures was quick and clear. In fact, one ofalready opted to do business with you so it is not
them, Charter Communications, dropped its plansreally an invasion of privacy. Strangers haven't
after protests arose over privacy concerns andand the more they feel targeted, the more they
U.S. Rep. Edward Markey (D-Mass.), chair of thewill treat these ads as what they really are, spam.
House Subcommittee on Telecommunications and